Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3313 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1432 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,326.74 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 157.82 FrankfurterGold $4,257.70/oz Gold APISilver $63.67/oz Gold API
Breaking
Umahi directs display of Tinubu’s pictures on First Niger Bridge Punch NigeriaAdams links Nigeria’s ambition to AFCON qualifying campaign Punch NigeriaIsbae U recalls fearing career was over after sex-for-roles controversy Punch NigeriaUS announces additional $267m for Ebola response in DRC Punch NigeriaPlateau lawmakers seek immediate security response after Barkin Ladi killings Punch NigeriaMbappé leads Europe’s top-five league scorers since 2020 Punch NigeriaPDP chieftain praises Ekiti governor over security vehicle donation Punch NigeriaTG Omori says overseas music videos can exceed $100,000 Punch NigeriaPaediatrician advises against vaginal douching Premium TimesIsbae U says desire for a new format led to interview series Punch Nigeria
Scores
Belgium U21 v Belarus U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSan Marino U21 v Kosovo U21 18:30 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSeattle Sounders v Real Salt Lake 2–0 American Major League Soccer · TheSportsDB
Politics

Court declines interim protection for former MLA in rape case

Source: The Hindu · 24 Sep 2026, 10:51 UTC
Court declines interim protection for former MLA in rape case
Image: The Hindu · original report

A court has refused interim protection to former MLA Narendra Pawar in a rape case, saying the allegations were serious. The court said it needed to hear the investigating officer and the complainant before considering interim relief, according to The Hindu.

A court has refused to grant interim protection to former MLA Narendra Pawar in a rape case, The Hindu reports. The court said the allegations against Pawar were serious. It also held that it was necessary to hear the investigating officer and the complainant before considering any request for interim relief.

The decision means that the court did not provide the requested temporary protection at this stage. The supplied material does not specify the nature of the protection sought or set out the allegations in detail. It also does not identify the court, provide the date of the next hearing or include responses from Pawar or the complainant.

The report says the court’s decision was based on the need to hear both the investigating officer and the complainant.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at The Hindu →