Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3272 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1403 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,328.29 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 158.23 FrankfurterGold $4,270.20/oz Gold APISilver $63.83/oz Gold API
Breaking
Yalcouye scores on debut as Ivory Coast defeat Ghana Punch NigeriaFelix strike gives Portugal narrow Nations League win over Wales Punch NigeriaAdeleke defends extension of UNIOSUN vice-chancellor’s tenure Punch NigeriaPeter Obi rejects proposed 2027 campaign council by Obi-Kwankwaso movement Punch NigeriaAPC figure calls for diaspora role in Adeola campaign structure Punch NigeriaNigeria links UN reform push to minerals and investment drive Channels TelevisionTrump’s broad use of national security claim draws criticism NPR USMoghalu rejects reported role in Atiku’s 2027 campaign team Punch NigeriaObi disputes Anambra claims over debt and liabilities Punch NigeriaTexas appeals court rejects innocence ruling for death-row woman ABC News US
Scores
Belgium U21 v Belarus U21 1–0 UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSan Marino U21 v Kosovo U21 0–3 UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSeattle Sounders v Real Salt Lake 2–0 American Major League Soccer · TheSportsDB
Politics

Court rejects divorce plea based on claims wife called husband dark and fat

Source: NDTV · 24 Sep 2026, 19:08 UTC

A High Court has ruled that allegations that a wife called her husband “dark” and “fat” did not establish cruelty or desertion sufficient to dissolve the marriage. The court said the husband had failed to prove the grounds required for divorce.

A High Court has rejected a husband’s attempt to dissolve his marriage on the basis of alleged remarks by his wife about his appearance. The case involved claims that the wife had called her husband “dark” and “fat”, according to NDTV. The court held that the husband had not established cruelty or desertion on the part of his wife.

Those were the grounds he relied on to seek dissolution of the marriage. The court’s finding meant that the evidence before it did not meet the threshold required for a divorce on those grounds. The supplied material does not identify the High Court, the couple or the jurisdiction in which the case was heard.

It also does not give the date of the ruling or explain the wider evidence considered by the judges. The report records the court’s conclusion that the husband had failed to prove the alleged cruelty and desertion. It does not state whether either party has indicated an intention to appeal.

No further details of the marriage, the proceedings or the specific context in which the alleged comments were made were included in the available material.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at NDTV →