Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3292 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1416 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,328.27 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 158.02 FrankfurterGold $4,270.30/oz Gold APISilver $63.59/oz Gold API
Breaking
Nigeria to tie tax-payment interest charges to borrowing costs from 2026 Punch NigeriaEx-NBA president says election disputes are shifting from voters to courts Punch NigeriaAndy Carroll says he was sexually assaulted in 2021 Punch NigeriaGovernment and CREDICORP begin discounted CNG tricycle scheme for youths Punch NigeriaTinubu congratulates museum chief on inclusion in TIME100 Art list Punch NigeriaSingapore financial institutions commit to expanding AI training for staff South China Morning PostFormer ADC Rivers governorship candidate resigns from party Punch NigeriaKingibe challenges Wike’s authority to avoid public scrutiny Punch NigeriaSakrebailu Elephant Camp to welcome visitors from September 26 The HinduBJP welcomes Supreme Court ruling in Danam Nagender case The Hindu
Scores
Belgium U21 v Belarus U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSan Marino U21 v Kosovo U21 18:30 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBSeattle Sounders v Real Salt Lake 2–0 American Major League Soccer · TheSportsDB
Politics

Delhi High Court refuses pre-arrest bail to quota activist

Source: India Today · 24 Sep 2026, 11:14 UTC
Delhi High Court refuses pre-arrest bail to quota activist
Image: India Today · original report

The Delhi High Court has denied pre-arrest bail to quota activist Ajeet Bharti in a case registered under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, according to India Today. The supplied material gives no details of the allegations, court reasoning or next legal steps.

The Delhi High Court has denied pre-arrest bail to quota activist Ajeet Bharti in a case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, according to India Today. The decision means the court did not grant Bharti protection from arrest before trial in the case identified by the report. The supplied material does not state when the order was issued or which police station or court proceedings are involved.

It gives no details of the allegations against Bharti, the section or sections invoked, or the arguments made by the prosecution and defence. The court’s reasons for refusing the application are also not included. The available account does not say whether Bharti has been arrested, whether an appeal or another legal application is planned, or what stage the underlying investigation has reached.

No statements from Bharti, investigators or the complainant are provided.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at India Today →