Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3253 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1393 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,327.74 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 158.50 FrankfurterGold $4,300.60/oz Gold APISilver $64.93/oz Gold API
Breaking
Atlético captain Lola Gallardo launches subscription-platform account Punch NigeriaPremier League backs calls for changes to FIFA governance Punch NigeriaNigeria Democratic Congress warns officials against charging registration fees Punch NigeriaMusiala and Havertz doubts cloud Germany’s Greece fixture Punch NigeriaOyo APC candidate congratulates Olubadan Ladoja on 82nd birthday Punch NigeriaAbia governor rules out presidential bid after current tenure Punch NigeriaChina leads US in share of elite AI researchers, Carnegie China study says South China Morning PostAsean urged to strengthen its role amid US-China rivalry South China Morning PostChinese officials bring traditional styles to Washington state visit South China Morning PostIndia’s CBI arrests alleged key suspect in call-centre cyberfraud case The Hindu
Scores
Estonia U21 v Faroe Islands U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBFinland U21 v Spain U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBCyprus U21 v Romania U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDB
Politics

Four women wrestlers appeal acquittal of Brij Bhushan

Source: The Hindu · 25 Sep 2026, 10:30 UTC
Four women wrestlers appeal acquittal of Brij Bhushan
Image: The Hindu · original report

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of Brij Bhushan in a sexual-harassment case. Their plea says the acquittal order was legally erroneous and unsustainable, according to The Hindu, but the supplied material gives no further procedural details.

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of Brij Bhushan in a sexual-harassment case. The Hindu reported that the wrestlers filed a plea against the acquittal order. According to the plea, the order was “erroneous and unsustainable in law.” The supplied material does not state which court will hear the challenge, when it was filed or what specific grounds the petition raises beyond the criticism of the acquittal.

It also does not provide the prosecution’s case, the defence’s response or the reasoning contained in the original order. No details were given about the alleged conduct, the evidence considered by the court or the relief sought by the four petitioners. The material does not say whether the court has admitted the challenge, issued notice or scheduled a hearing.

The appeal means the acquittal is being contested, but the information provided does not establish the outcome of that challenge. It records the wrestlers’ legal position that the earlier order should not stand because, in their view, it was legally flawed. Further details about the proceedings were not included in the supplied report.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at The Hindu →