Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3254 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1392 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,328.38 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 158.48 FrankfurterGold $4,309.10/oz Gold APISilver $65.08/oz Gold API
Breaking
Khafi and Gedoni mark six years of marriage Punch NigeriaCross River launches oil and gas training for 2,000 youths Punch NigeriaOtti Supports Fuel Subsidy Removal and Warns Against Reversal Punch NigeriaNIPCO Announces Plans for $3bn Floating LNG Project in Nigeria Punch NigeriaUniversity of Uyo plans policy to make sports financially sustainable Punch NigeriaOkoye joins Nigeria camp before Madagascar qualifier Punch NigeriaLagos police shut suspected counterfeit alcohol site in Badagry Punch NigeriaGaladima questions fairness of 2027 presidential election Punch NigeriaIndia’s ‘cockroach’ youth movement shifts focus to election watchdog South China Morning PostChina and EU remain divided over medical-device trade South China Morning Post
Scores
Estonia U21 v Faroe Islands U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBFinland U21 v Spain U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBCyprus U21 v Romania U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDB
Politics

India’s Supreme Court rejects plea seeking Hindi as official language

Source: NDTV · 25 Sep 2026, 08:40 UTC

India’s Supreme Court has rejected a public interest petition seeking to make Hindi an official language, NDTV reported. The bench said the relief requested would require an amendment to the Constitution. The supplied material does not identify the petitioner, give the court’s wider reasoning or state whether any related language claims remain pending.

India’s Supreme Court has rejected a plea seeking to make Hindi an official language, according to NDTV. The case was filed as a public interest litigation. The bench said the relief sought would require an amendment to the Constitution.

That observation formed part of the court’s response to the request, but the supplied material does not provide the full judgment or explain the constitutional provisions considered by the judges. It also does not identify the petitioner, state the date of the ruling or give details of any other arguments made in the case.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at NDTV →