Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3381 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1480 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,328.49 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 157.39 FrankfurterGold $4,336.90/oz Gold APISilver $66.49/oz Gold API
Breaking
Kano agency examines Lagos model for social protection planning Punch NigeriaOnline satire grows as Negeri Sembilan royal dispute remains unresolved South China Morning PostABVP submits memorandum after NLSIU documentary screening dispute The HinduWoman dies after wild elephant attack in Kerala’s Attappady The HinduChouhan says Bihar floods have affected 50 lakh people during survey The HinduConsultation urges women’s role in designing safer public spaces The HinduCongress attacks proposed UCC process after judge quits Maharashtra panel The HinduElection Commission freezes Trinamool name and symbol ahead of bypolls The HinduAI optimism lifts technology markets as summit expectations build South China Morning PostCamsense begins Hong Kong listing despite US restrictions on vacuum robots South China Morning Post
Scores
Birmingham Legion v Brooklyn FC 16:00 UTC American USL Championship · TheSportsDBIndependiente Santa Fe v Deportivo Cali 0–1 Colombia Categoría Primera A · TheSportsDBADT v Cienciano 20:00 UTC Peruvian Primera Division · TheSportsDB
Science & Health

Supreme Court questions silence over costly cancer medicines

Source: The Hindu · 23 Sep 2026, 04:48 UTC
Supreme Court questions silence over costly cancer medicines
Image: The Hindu · original report

The Supreme Court has criticised what it described as excessive pricing of essential cancer medicines, calling the situation “broad daylight dacoity”. The Bench also expressed surprise that authorities responsible for acting on the issue had remained silent, according to The Hindu’s report.

The Supreme Court has sharply questioned the pricing of essential cancer medicines, describing the situation as “broad daylight dacoity”, according to The Hindu. The Bench said it was surprised that authorities expected to take action against the alleged overpricing had not acted. “It is very surprising that the authorities who are supposed to take action on this are silent,” the Bench said.

The source material does not identify the medicines involved, the authorities referred to, or any directions issued by the court. It also does not provide details of the pricing under examination or the response of the parties concerned. The remarks place the affordability of essential cancer treatment and the role of regulatory authorities at the centre of the proceedings.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at The Hindu →