Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3254 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1394 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,327.74 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 158.49 FrankfurterGold $4,305.00/oz Gold APISilver $64.93/oz Gold API
Breaking
Nigerian X user apologises for circulating fabricated Itel explosion image Punch NigeriaJAMB publishes five-step process for checking support-ticket status Punch NigeriaSuleja areas scheduled for 20-minute power interruption on Saturday Punch NigeriaEducation minister calls for diaspora support for reform programme Punch NigeriaOtti explains support for Tinubu’s 2027 re-election bid Punch NigeriaNigeria and Germany discuss steel investment and technology transfer Punch NigeriaScholars urge Washington and Beijing to build AI safety rules South China Morning PostOsun APC challenges assembly plan for managing motor parks Premium TimesTaiwan awaits clarity after Trump-Xi talks on the island’s future South China Morning PostKhafi and Gedoni mark six years of marriage Punch Nigeria
Scores
Estonia U21 v Faroe Islands U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBFinland U21 v Spain U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDBCyprus U21 v Romania U21 15:00 UTC UEFA European Under-21 Championship · TheSportsDB
Politics

Supreme Court rejects plea for Hindi panel on apex court language

Source: The Hindu · 25 Sep 2026, 10:17 UTC
Supreme Court rejects plea for Hindi panel on apex court language
Image: The Hindu · original report

India’s Supreme Court has rejected a public-interest litigation seeking a panel to examine the use of Hindi as an official language of the court. The bench said language reforms were already under administrative consideration and could not be introduced through judicial orders.

The Supreme Court has rejected a public-interest litigation seeking the creation of a panel to examine the use of Hindi as an official language of the apex court. The bench comprised Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, The Hindu reported.

The judges said reforms relating to language were already being considered through administrative processes. They held that such changes could not be brought about through judicial orders. The ruling leaves the consideration of language-related reforms within the administrative process referred to by the bench.

The available report did not provide details of the petitioners’ arguments or explain the proposed panel’s intended mandate. It also did not specify what administrative steps were under consideration or whether the court’s observations set a timetable for any decision.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at The Hindu →