Global perspective. Clear attribution. Updated throughout the day.
Live desk Concise briefs from trusted publishers · Always follow the source for the full report
Markets
GBP/USD 1.3391 FrankfurterEUR/USD 1.1481 FrankfurterUSD/NGN 1,329.48 FrankfurterUSD/JPY 157.34 FrankfurterGold $4,333.40/oz Gold APISilver $65.95/oz Gold API
Breaking
Abuja court sets October 26 date for El-Rufai no-case ruling Punch NigeriaSophia Momodu recalls backlash over pregnancy outside marriage Punch NigeriaEkiti health commissioner urges hygiene and routine medical checks Punch NigeriaTwenty Super Eagles players report for 2027 AFCON preparations Punch NigeriaBayelsa host communities praise Halkin investment in local infrastructure Punch NigeriaKano police seek 37-year-old man over alleged financial crimes Punch NigeriaNigeria ranked Africa’s fourth-largest aviation market after 18.8 million passengers in 2025 Punch NigeriaCharly Boy says he connected Isbae U with Obasanjo for YouTube interview Punch NigeriaResidents leave Kebbi community after reported ethnic clash kills at least 15 Channels TelevisionAkwa Ibom governor inaugurates 14.8km road project in predecessor’s hometown Punch Nigeria
Scores
Lanús v Estudiantes de La Plata 2–1 Argentinian Primera Division · TheSportsDBCuiabá v Náutico 3–0 Brazilian Serie B · TheSportsDBSevastopol v Rubin Yalta 13:00 UTC Russia FNL 2 Group 1 · TheSportsDB
World

UN leadership interview raises questions over panel’s accountability

Source: NDTV · 22 Sep 2026, 09:54 UTC

An opinion piece published by NDTV questions the accountability of the governments involved in interviewing candidates to become the United Nations’ next chief. It argues that some panel members have contributed to the organisation’s ineffectiveness through wars, vetoes and unpaid dues, but the supplied material gives no further details.

An NDTV opinion article has questioned the role of governments interviewing candidates to become the next head of the United Nations. The article says the interview panel includes governments whose wars, use of vetoes and unpaid financial contributions have helped make the organisation ineffective. Its argument focuses on the accountability of those conducting the interviews.

The supplied material does not identify the candidates, name the governments on the panel, or describe the selection timetable. It also does not provide responses from the United Nations or from any government criticised in the opinion piece. The available information supports the article’s central question about whether governments with contested records should be responsible for assessing the organisation’s next chief.

About this report
This independently written report is based on information supplied by the named publisher. Vertrix News has not independently verified the source report.
View the original source at NDTV →